Skip to content
type1.science

Insulin glulisine (Apidra)

Sanofi

What it is

A rapid-acting mealtime analog, zinc-free so it stays largely un-clustered in the vial — giving it a marginally faster early action than aspart or lispro, but the same broad mealtime curve.

Editorial review: .

Most recent recorded citation date: 2025-05-01. Only explicit date metadata is included; an undated citation may be newer. This does not mean every claim was reviewed on that date.

Trial status, labels and access can change between reviews. How we review the evidence · How to read the evidence

Full sources ↓Full discussion ↓Report an issue →

Available nowRegulator-approvedrapidmealtime

Evidence behind this assessment

Key evidence notes. Study results, product eligibility and access answer different questions.

Who was studied?
Study populations and analysis groups vary. Product age limits alone do not describe who was studied.
Benefit or performance
Consistency: Low intra-subject variability, holding across BMI and ethnicity — but more prone to fibrillation/precipitation in pumps, raising occlusion risk.[3]
Important harms and treatment burden
Read the safety discussion and original sources. A missing summary does not establish safety.
Approval and country access
Country-specific approval and access are not summarized in this record.Approval, trial recruitment, local supply and funding are separate. Check the cited label or access source.
Follow-up and remaining uncertainty
Read the full discussion and original sources for follow-up duration and study limitations.
Editorial score: calculation and evidence

A weighted editorial judgment on a 0–100 scale, not a probability of success or a measured treatment effect. Higher criterion scores mean more favorable assessments.

Default calculation: 60 × 20 + 56 × 25 + 54 × 15 + 64 × 20 + 53 × 10 + 64 × 10 = 5860; divide by total weight 100. Unrounded weighted result: 58.6.

Onset speed60

At the front of the standard rapid analogs and marginally ahead of aspart/lispro in early exposure, but not an ultra-rapid reformulation. Scored against mealtime peers.[4]

Time to peak56

Peak serum level at ~60 min (vs ~120 min for regular insulin); a typical mealtime lag people pre-bolus around. Faster is better for a mealtime role.[1]

Short tail54

~42-min half-life and ~4-h duration give a clean-ish rapid-analog tail; shorter than regular insulin but not meaningfully shorter than aspart/lispro.[4]

Consistency64

Low intra-subject variability, holding across BMI and ethnicity — but more prone to fibrillation/precipitation in pumps, raising occlusion risk.[3]

Exercise flexibility53

Standard rapid-analog behavior around activity; the ~4-h tail still complicates exercise like its peers.

Access & cost64

Approved in major markets; the recent US list-price cut has improved affordability.[8]

Insulins are scored relative to their role peers (see tags: rapid, ultra-rapid, basal, inhaled). A basal insulin's onset score compares it to other basals, not to mealtime insulins.

Editor’s take

The classic rapid analog with the thinnest pump support — its zinc-free formulation buys a sliver of early speed but trades away in-pump stability. A solid injection-pen mealtime insulin, not a reason to switch loops.

The full picture

Insulin glulisine is Sanofi's rapid-acting mealtime analog, sold as Apidra. Like every rapid analog it is the body's own insulin with two amino-acid swaps — here lysine and glutamic acid replace asparagine and lysine on the insulin B chain — that discourage the molecules from clumping so they absorb faster after a subcutaneous injection.3 Its one formulation quirk is that it carries no added zinc: where aspart and lispro rely on zinc to form orderly six-molecule clusters in the vial, glulisine stays largely as single molecules and pairs, so it is ready to be absorbed the moment it is injected.3

In practice this buys only a sliver of speed. Glulisine peaks at about an hour, and is largely gone in around 4 hours.4 On the official label, its blood level peaks near 60 minutes after injection versus about 120 minutes for older "regular" human insulin, and its terminal half-life is about 42 minutes.1 Head-to-head against insulin lispro it shows slightly higher, slightly earlier insulin levels in the first half-hour after a meal, but the overall glucose control is equivalent and the difference is modest.5 We therefore rank it at the front of the standard rapid analogs, not among the newer ultra-rapid formulations (Fiasp, Lyumjev) that were engineered specifically to beat this curve — and far from a healthy pancreas.

Absorption is reassuringly consistent: within-person variability is low and, helpfully, holds steady across body weights and ethnic groups.3 It can be dosed flexibly — within 15 minutes before a meal or up to 20 minutes after starting one — which helps with unpredictable appetites, especially in children.1

Delivery is the one place glulisine lags its peers. It is approved for injection by pen or syringe, for insulin-pump use, and (under medical supervision) intravenously.1 But in pumps it is the most fragile of the three classic rapid analogs: it is more prone to forming fibrils and inactive protein clumps, and one comparative analysis reported markedly higher infusion-set occlusion rates (about 41%, versus roughly 9% for aspart and 16% for lispro).6 A systematic review reached the same direction more cautiously — broadly similar stability, but a real signal that glulisine precipitates and occludes more readily under pump conditions.7 That makes it a strong pen insulin and a second-choice pump insulin.

Glulisine was approved by the FDA in 2004 (down to age 4) and by the EMA the same year (down to age 6), and is marketed in the US and EU.12 On cost, Sanofi sharply cut Apidra's US list price by 70% effective January 2024, making it notably more affordable.8

What's coming for glulisine specifically is mostly less, not more: with the patent era over, the realistic near-term change is price — potential biosimilar entry that would lower cost — rather than a faster reformulation. The speed frontier in mealtime insulin is being pushed by the ultra-rapid analogs and by experimental concentration-jump and warming approaches, none of which are built on glulisine. For most people it remains a dependable, now-cheaper mealtime pen insulin whose ceiling is the same subcutaneous-absorption physics that limits the whole class.

What's next for this

  • →With the patent era over, realistic near-term change is price — potential biosimilar entry that would lower cost (no faster reformulation planned)

Sources

  1. [1]
    APIDRA (insulin glulisine) injection — prescribing information · Regulatory decision · 2025-05-01

    APIDRA (insulin glulisine) injection — prescribing information. DailyMed / U.S. FDA (2022).

  2. [2]
    Apidra (insulin glulisine) — European Public Assessment Report · Regulatory decision · 2004-09-27

    Apidra (insulin glulisine) — European Public Assessment Report. European Medicines Agency (2004).

  3. [3]
    Becker RHA, Frick AD. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin glulisine. Clin Pharmacokinet (2008). · Peer-reviewed study · 2008-01-01

    Becker RHA, Frick AD. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin glulisine. Clinical Pharmacokinetics (2008).

  4. [4]
    Garg SK, Ellis SL, Ulrich H. Insulin glulisine — a new rapid-acting insulin analogue. Expert Opin Pharmacother (2005). · Peer-reviewed study · 2005-04-01

    Garg SK, Ellis SL, Ulrich H. Insulin glulisine: a new rapid-acting insulin analogue for the treatment of diabetes. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (2005).

  5. [5]
    Luzio S, et al. A comparison of preprandial insulin glulisine versus insulin lispro in people with Type 2 diabetes over a 12-h period. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2007). · Peer-reviewed study · 2007-12-27

    Luzio S, Peter R, Dunseath GJ, Mustafa L, Owens DR. A comparison of preprandial insulin glulisine versus insulin lispro in people with Type 2 diabetes over a 12-h period. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (2007).

  6. [6]
    Bode BW. Comparison of pharmacokinetic properties, physicochemical stability, and pump compatibility of 3 rapid-acting insulin analogues — aspart, lispro, and glulisine. Endocr Pract (2011). · Peer-reviewed study · 2011-03-01

    Bode BW. Comparison of pharmacokinetic properties, physicochemical stability, and pump compatibility of aspart, lispro and glulisine. Endocrine Practice (2011).

  7. [7]
    Kerr D, et al. Stability and performance of rapid-acting insulin analogs used for CSII — a systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol (2013). · Peer-reviewed study · 2013-11-01

    Kerr D, Wizemann E, Senstius J, Zacho M, Ampudia-Blasco FJ. Stability and performance of rapid-acting insulin analogs used for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a systematic review. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (2013).

  8. [8]
    Sanofi announces insulin price cuts, $35 monthly cap for people with commercial insurance · Science journalism · 2023-03-17

    Sanofi announces insulin price cuts. Healio (2023).