Skip to content
type1.science

Insulin aspart (NovoLog / NovoRapid)

Novo Nordisk

What it is

The long-standing rapid-acting mealtime analog and the practical reference point for "rapid insulin": approved since 1999–2000, pump-cleared, widely available (now with biosimilars) — but slower than a healthy pancreas and the baseline the ultra-rapid formulations were built to beat.

Editorial review: .

Most recent recorded citation date: 2026-06-19. Only explicit date metadata is included; an undated citation may be newer. This does not mean every claim was reviewed on that date.

Trial status, labels and access can change between reviews. How we review the evidence · How to read the evidence

Full sources ↓Full discussion ↓Report an issue →

Available nowRegulator-approvedrapidmealtime

Evidence behind this assessment

Key evidence notes. Study results, product eligibility and access answer different questions.

Who was studied?
Study populations and analysis groups vary. Product age limits alone do not describe who was studied.See the linked studies and their populations →
Benefit or performance
Consistency: Decades of clamp and trial data; well characterized, though absorption still varies with injection site, blood flow, and activity.[1]
Important harms and treatment burden
Read the safety discussion and original sources. A missing summary does not establish safety.
Approval and country access
Country-specific approval and access are not summarized in this record.Approval, trial recruitment, local supply and funding are separate. Check the cited label or access source.
Follow-up and remaining uncertainty
Read the full discussion and original sources for follow-up duration and study limitations.
Editorial score: calculation and evidence

A weighted editorial judgment on a 0–100 scale, not a probability of success or a measured treatment effect. Higher criterion scores mean more favorable assessments.

Default calculation: 58 × 20 + 55 × 25 + 55 × 15 + 70 × 20 + 52 × 10 + 80 × 10 = 6080; divide by total weight 100. Unrounded weighted result: 60.8.

Onset speed58

Rapid-peer convention. Onset of action ~25 min and onset of appearance ~7 min for the aspart arm in faster-aspart clamp studies — reliable, but the baseline ultra-rapid analogs improve on.[3]

Time to peak55

Rapid-peer convention (faster peak = better for mealtime). Median plasma Tmax 40–50 min; peak glucose-lowering effect 1–3 h — the familiar mealtime lag people pre-bolus around.[1]

Short tail55

Rapid-peer convention (short = better for mealtime). 3–5 h duration, ~81-min half-life; a typical rapid-analog tail with normal stacking risk.[1]

Consistency70

Decades of clamp and trial data; well characterized, though absorption still varies with injection site, blood flow, and activity.[1]

Exercise flexibility52

The 3–5-hour action profile can contribute to hypoglycemia during activity. Dose and carbohydrate adjustments depend on timing, intensity, insulin on board and the individual’s care plan.[7]

Access & cost80

A widely available analog, now with FDA-approved biosimilars (the first interchangeable rapid-acting insulin).[8]

Insulins are scored relative to their role peers (see tags: rapid, ultra-rapid, basal, inhaled). A basal insulin's onset score compares it to other basals, not to mealtime insulins.

Editor’s take

The honest baseline. It's the insulin most loops were tuned on and the one ultra-rapid analogs are measured against — a useful zero-point for the speed rankings rather than a leader on them. "Good, available, and increasingly affordable" is itself worth a lot.

The full picture

Insulin aspart is the workhorse rapid-acting mealtime analog. It's made by Novo Nordisk under the brand names NovoLog (US) and NovoRapid (EU), approved in the EU in September 1999 and in the US around 2000.21 A single amino-acid swap (proline → aspartic acid at position B28) means it is absorbed faster than older "regular" human insulin after a subcutaneous injection.1

Type and role. This is a rapid (mealtime/bolus) insulin — taken to cover the carbohydrate in a meal, not to provide background coverage. It is scored here against other rapid analogs, so its numbers are the genre's reference point rather than a basal-style flat curve.

PK/PD — the real numbers. In clamp studies comparing faster aspart with aspart, onset of action for the aspart arm is around 25 minutes and the insulin first appears in the blood at about 7 minutes.3 Plasma levels peak at a median of 40–50 minutes — about twice as fast as regular human insulin (80–120 minutes) — while the maximum glucose-lowering effect lands 1–3 hours after the dose.1 Total duration is 3–5 hours, with an apparent half-life of about 81 minutes.1 The roughly 80% bioavailability figure sometimes cited comes from faster-aspart studies and should not be presented as a conventional-aspart product estimate.4 The practical takeaway: even a "rapid" analog still lags a healthy pancreas, which is why post-meal spikes and the need to pre-bolus persist.6

Absorption variability. Onset and rate of absorption shift with the injection site, blood flow, temperature, and physical activity — the same dose can behave differently day to day.1 Across head-to-head trials, mealtime aspart lowers post-meal glucose more than regular insulin (about −22 mg/dL in type 1 diabetes) and modestly improves HbA1c.56 That HbA1c advantage, however, looks smaller under the most rigorous synthesis to date — see below.

A sobering synthesis. In June 2026 a Cochrane network meta-analysis pooled 15 randomised trials and 6,335 adults with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections, comparing aspart, lispro, glulisine, ultra-rapid lispro and faster aspart against plain regular human insulin. Its conclusion is deflating: on low-certainty evidence, all five analogues may produce little to no difference in HbA1c versus regular human insulin (aspart −0.14%, 95% CI −0.21 to −0.06). Some agents may cut severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis — ultra-rapid lispro scored best on severe hypoglycemia (RR 0.80) — but every one of those confidence intervals crosses 1, the certainty is rated low to very low, and there were no long-term follow-up data at all. Aspart did show a possible reduction in severe nocturnal hypoglycemia (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.88), though on very-low-certainty evidence. Thirteen of the fifteen trials were industry-funded.9 None of this makes analogues a bad choice; their advantages in dose timing, flexibility and convenience are real. But it is an honest reminder that on the single number most people are judged by, the analogue era bought less than the marketing implied — and it is exactly why this site ranks insulins on speed, tail and flexibility rather than on HbA1c alone.

Exercise. Because the 3–5 hour tail keeps working during activity, circulating aspart can contribute to exercise lows; consensus guidance covers cutting the pre-exercise meal bolus (and/or adding carbohydrate) for moderate activity.7

Delivery and approvals. Aspart is delivered by pen, syringe, insulin pump (it is cleared for continuous subcutaneous infusion), and intravenously in clinical settings.1 It is approved for type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults and children — from age 1 in the EU.2

Access, cost, biosimilars. Aspart is a widely available analog, sold in the US and EU. Biosimilars have now arrived: the FDA approved Merilog (insulin aspart-szjj) in February 2025 as the first US aspart biosimilar, and Kirsty (insulin aspart-xjhz) followed as the first interchangeable rapid-acting insulin — meaning a pharmacist may substitute it for NovoLog depending on state laws.8

What's coming. The aspart molecule itself is mature; the frontier is making it faster. Novo Nordisk's faster aspart (Fiasp) adds niacinamide and L-arginine to speed early absorption, and newer ultra-rapid formulations push onset earlier still — all aimed at closing the gap between injected insulin and the body's own faster response.6 We therefore rank aspart as the reference point, not the frontrunner, on speed: it's the right zero-line for reading the insulin-speed gap, even as its access score climbs with biosimilar competition.

Sources

  1. [1]
    NOVOLOG (insulin aspart) injection — full prescribing information · Regulatory decision · 2000-06-07

    FDA / Novo Nordisk. NOVOLOG (insulin aspart) injection — prescribing information ("Initial U.S. Approval: 2000"). DailyMed (2000).

    FDA / Novo Nordisk. NOVOLOG prescribing information — Description (B28 proline→aspartic-acid substitution). DailyMed.

    FDA / Novo Nordisk. NOVOLOG prescribing information — median Tmax 40–50 min vs 80–120 min for regular human insulin; peak effect 1–3 h; duration 3–5 h; half-life ~81 min. DailyMed.

    FDA / Novo Nordisk. NOVOLOG prescribing information — "the rate of insulin absorption and onset of activity is affected by the site of injection, exercise, and other variables." DailyMed.

    FDA / Novo Nordisk. NOVOLOG prescribing information — subcutaneous injection, continuous subcutaneous infusion (pump), and intravenous use. DailyMed.

  2. [2]
    NovoRapid (insulin aspart) — EMA European Public Assessment Report · Regulatory decision · 1999-09-07

    European Medicines Agency. NovoRapid (insulin aspart) — European Public Assessment Report. EMA (authorised 1999).

  3. [3]
    Fast-acting insulin aspart in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes: faster onset… relative to insulin aspart (clamp comparison) · Peer-reviewed study · 2017-07-07

    Shiramoto M, et al. Fast-acting insulin aspart in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes: faster onset… relative to insulin aspart. J Diabetes Investig (2017). PMID 28556616.

  4. [4]
    Pharmacokinetic properties of fast-acting insulin aspart administered in different subcutaneous injection regions · Peer-reviewed study · 2017-02-10

    Hövelmann U, et al. Pharmacokinetic properties of fast-acting insulin aspart in different subcutaneous injection regions (absolute bioavailability ~80%; figure measured for faster aspart / Fiasp, not conventional insulin aspart). Clin Drug Investig (2017). PMID 28185141.

  5. [5]
    Rapid-acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin: a meta-analysis of effects on glycemic control · Peer-reviewed study · 2019-12-23

    Nicolucci A, et al. Rapid-acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin: a meta-analysis (post-meal glucose −22.2 mg/dL; HbA1c −0.13% in type 1 diabetes). Diabetes Ther (2019). PMID 31873857.

  6. [6]
    The continuing quest for better subcutaneously administered prandial insulins · Peer-reviewed study · 2020-02-03

    Owens DR, Bolli GB. The continuing quest for better subcutaneously administered prandial insulins. Diabetes Obes Metab (2020). PMID 31930670.

  7. [7]
    Exercise management in type 1 diabetes — a consensus statement · Peer-reviewed study · 2017-01-24

    Riddell MC, et al. Exercise management in type 1 diabetes: a consensus statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2017). PMID 28126459.

  8. [8]
    FDA biosimilar product information (insulin aspart-szjj, -xjhz) · Regulatory decision · 2025-02-14

    U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Biosimilar product information — insulin aspart-szjj (Merilog, Feb 2025) and the interchangeable insulin aspart-xjhz (Kirsty). FDA (2025).

  9. [9]
    Guo Y, Mei Y, Bongaerts B, et al. (Ultra-)short-acting insulin analogues for adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus on multiple daily injections — a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2026;6:CD012161 · Peer-reviewed study · 2026-06-19 — 15 RCTs, 6,335 adults with type 1 diabetes on MDI. Low-certainty evidence that all five rapid analogues produce little to no difference in HbA1c vs regular human insulin. WHO-funded; 13 of 15 included studies were industry-funded.

    Guo Y, Mei Y, Bongaerts B, et al. (Ultra-)short-acting insulin analogues for adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus on multiple daily injections: a network meta-analysis (15 RCTs, 6,335 adults; low-certainty evidence of little to no difference in HbA1c vs regular human insulin; 13 of 15 trials industry-funded). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2026;6:CD012161). PMID 42318853.