PROTECT: Teplizumab in children and adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes
What this study tests
A Phase 3 trial testing whether two short courses of the immune therapy teplizumab can preserve the body's own insulin production in 8-17-year-olds newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Teplizumab significantly preserved C-peptide (a measure of remaining insulin-making capacity) versus placebo at 18 months, though day-to-day diabetes measures (insulin dose, HbA1c, time in range) did not differ significantly in the original randomized analysis.
Editorial review: .
Registry checked: 2026-09-17. Registry’s own update: 2024-04-24.
Most recent recorded citation date: 2023-10-18. Only explicit date metadata is included; an undated citation may be newer. This does not mean every claim was reviewed on that date.
Trial status, labels and access can change between reviews. How we review the evidence · How to read the evidence
Evidence at a glance
- Who can enter the study?
- Children and adolescents aged 8-17 with type 1 diabetes diagnosed within the prior 6 weeks (42 days), positive T1D autoantibodies, and detectable remaining insulin production (peak C-peptide at least 0.2 pmol/mL). Other significant autoimmune disease or active infection excluded. Registered eligibility ↗Enrollment criteria describe who may enter. They do not establish who was analyzed or the denominator for a reported result.
- Reported benefit and results
- Met its primary endpoint: at 18 months, teplizumab-treated patients had significantly higher stimulated C-peptide than placebo (least-squares mean difference 0.13 pmol/mL; 95% CI 0.09-0.17; P<0.001), and 94.9% of treated patients vs 79.2% on placebo retained a clinically meaningful peak C-peptide of at least 0.2 pmol/mL. However, the key secondary endpoints (insulin dose, HbA1c, time in range, hypoglycemia) did not differ significantly between groups. Common side effects included headache, gastrointestinal symptoms, rash, lymphopenia, and mild cytokine release syndrome.Read the result sources and their limitations →
- Important harms
- Read the reported results, safety discussion and original sources. A separate harms summary is not available; this does not establish safety.
- Research access and approval
- Study regions: United States, United Kingdom, European Union, Canada. A trial listing does not establish product approval or current recruitment at a particular site. Check the study’s current entry requirements.
- What remains uncertain?
- Read the full discussion and original sources for study limitations. Planned endpoints and completion dates are not results.
Research status alone does not establish approval, clinical benefit or local availability.
Primary endpoints
- Change from baseline in stimulated C-peptide (β-cell function), measured by mixed-meal tolerance test, at week 78
The full picture
What PROTECT tested and why it matters
In type 1 diabetes, the immune system attacks the insulin-making beta cells in the pancreas. At diagnosis, most people still have some working beta cells — a "honeymoon" window that fades over months to years. PROTECT asked a focused question: can a short course of the immune therapy teplizumab, given right after diagnosis, slow that loss and protect the body's own insulin production?1
Teplizumab is an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody that dampens the T cells driving the attack.1 It is FDA-approved (as Tzield) to delay the onset of clinical (stage 3) diabetes in people aged 1 and older who have earlier-stage (stage 2) disease, and the FDA granted accelerated approval in 2026 for the newly diagnosed 8-17 age group PROTECT studied.2 PROTECT asked the further question: does it help people who have already been diagnosed?1
Who it was for
PROTECT enrolled 328 children and adolescents aged 8-17 who had been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes within the previous 6 weeks, had positive diabetes autoantibodies, and still had measurable insulin production.13 It ran across roughly 47 sites in the US, Canada, the UK, and several European countries.3
How it was designed
This was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.1 Participants were assigned 2:1 to teplizumab (217) or placebo (111), each given as two 12-day intravenous courses six months apart.13 The main outcome was the change in stimulated C-peptide — a blood marker of how much insulin the pancreas can still make — measured at week 78 (about 18 months).13
Key results
PROTECT met its primary goal. At week 78, teplizumab-treated patients had significantly higher stimulated C-peptide than the placebo group (least-squares mean difference 0.13 pmol/mL; 95% CI 0.09-0.17; P<0.001).1 Nearly all treated patients (94.9%) kept a clinically meaningful C-peptide level of at least 0.2 pmol/mL, versus 79.2% on placebo.1
Importantly, the day-to-day diabetes measures that matter most to patients — insulin dose, HbA1c, time in target glucose range, and hypoglycemia — did not differ significantly between the groups.1 The current label also carries a boxed warning about serious viral reactivation and has additional infection, immune-status and laboratory precautions.2 Common side effects were headache, gastrointestinal symptoms, rash, lymphopenia (low white-cell counts), and mild cytokine release syndrome, mostly around the infusions.1
September 2026 per-protocol analysis
A prespecified per-protocol analysis published on 10 September 2026 included 275 participants (180 teplizumab, 95 placebo). At week 78 it reported a C-peptide difference of 0.14 nmol/L, an insulin-dose difference of −0.17 U/kg/day and 6.17 percentage points more time in range (95% CI 0.13–12.2; nominal p<0.05). This selected analysis excluded participants with low adherence or other protocol deviations, including some whose dosing stopped for adverse events. It supports further interpretation but does not replace the original intention-to-treat result, whose key secondary endpoints were not significant.4
What it means and what's next
PROTECT shows teplizumab can preserve beta-cell function after diagnosis — biological proof that the disease can be slowed even after symptoms begin.1 The original trial did not establish significant differences in its key clinical secondary outcomes at 18 months. The selected September per-protocol analysis adds context, but the long-term clinical meaning of preserving C-peptide remains a separate question.14
Sources
- [1]Teplizumab and β-Cell Function in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes. · Peer-reviewed study · 2023-10-18
Ramos EL, Dayan CM, Chatenoud L, et al. Teplizumab and β-Cell Function in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes (PROTECT). N Engl J Med (2023). According to PubMed (PMID 37861217); DOI.
- [2]TZIELD US prescribing information, June 2026 · Regulatory decision — Current label includes stage-2 ages1+ and accelerated stage-3 ages8–17 indications, boxed warnings and contraindications.
Sanofi. TZIELD (teplizumab-mzwv) US Prescribing Information (June 2026 label; stage-2 delay indication in adults and pediatric patients 1 year and older; stage-3 new-onset indication in ages 8-17).
- [3]Provention Bio / Sanofi. Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Teplizumab (PROTECT), NCT03875729. *ClinicalTrials.gov* (registry record) · Trial registry
Provention Bio / Sanofi. Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Teplizumab (PROTECT), NCT03875729. ClinicalTrials.gov (registry record).
- [4]