Skip to content
type1.science

CT-868 (acmopatide)

Carmot Therapeutics (Roche)

Early metabolic benefit; development discontinued.

What it is

An investigational once-daily GLP-1/GIP agonist studied as an insulin adjunct in adults with type 1 diabetes and overweight or obesity. A 16-week phase 2 reported modest HbA1c improvement, weight loss and lower insulin use. Roche removed acmopatide from its phase 2 pipeline in July 2026; the programme did not advance to phase 3.

Editorial review: .

Most recent recorded citation date: 2026-07-23. Only explicit date metadata is included; an undated citation may be newer. This does not mean every claim was reviewed on that date.

Trial status, labels and access can change between reviews. How we review the evidence · How to read the evidence

Full sources ↓Full discussion ↓Report an issue →

Not availableModerate evidenceadjunctglp-1gipincretinweightinsulin-sparingpipeline

Evidence behind this assessment

Key evidence notes. Study results, product eligibility and access answer different questions.

Who was studied?
Study populations and analysis groups vary. Product age limits alone do not describe who was studied.
Benefit or performance
Glycemic benefit: In type 1 diabetes, A1c fell 0.34% from a baseline of 7.5% at the 4.1 mg dose, and 56% of participants reached an A1c below 7%. That is a real effect, but a modest one — the weight and insulin-dose results are the bigger story. Continuous-glucose time-in-range figures have not been published.[1]
Important harms and treatment burden
Safety: Generally well tolerated, with no diabetic ketoacidosis and no level 3 (severe) hypoglycemia reported over 16 weeks. Time spent below 54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L) rose numerically on the drug but stayed under the recommended 1% ceiling in every group. Held back from a higher score because this is conference-only data — 111 people over four months cannot rule out rarer harms, and no peer-reviewed type 1 publication exists yet.[3]
Approval and country access
Unapproved investigational drug. Roche removed the T1D programme from its development pipeline; no commercial or routine off-label access exists.Approval, trial recruitment, local supply and funding are separate. Check the cited label or access source.
Follow-up and remaining uncertainty
Read the full discussion and original sources for follow-up duration and study limitations.

This record cites company or conference reports. Those sources may describe interim findings; their source type is shown in the source list.

Editorial score: calculation and evidence

A weighted editorial judgment on a 0–100 scale, not a probability of success or a measured treatment effect. Higher criterion scores mean more favorable assessments.

Default calculation: 55 × 25 + 70 × 25 + 80 × 15 + 35 × 20 + 0 × 15 = 5025; divide by total weight 100. Unrounded weighted result: 50.25.

Glycemic benefit55

In type 1 diabetes, A1c fell 0.34% from a baseline of 7.5% at the 4.1 mg dose, and 56% of participants reached an A1c below 7%. That is a real effect, but a modest one — the weight and insulin-dose results are the bigger story. Continuous-glucose time-in-range figures have not been published.[1]

Safety70

Generally well tolerated, with no diabetic ketoacidosis and no level 3 (severe) hypoglycemia reported over 16 weeks. Time spent below 54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L) rose numerically on the drug but stayed under the recommended 1% ceiling in every group. Held back from a higher score because this is conference-only data — 111 people over four months cannot rule out rarer harms, and no peer-reviewed type 1 publication exists yet.[3]

Wider metabolic benefit80

The strongest results in the trial: dose-dependent weight loss of up to about 7% versus placebo, and daily insulin dose reduced by up to 15%. Participants started at a mean BMI of 34, so this targets a real and common problem. No blood-pressure, cardiovascular or kidney outcomes have been reported.[1]

Maturity35

Editorial assessment: one completed short phase 2 study with conference-reported results. Roche removed the T1D programme from phase II in July 2026; there is no verified phase 3 advancement.[5]

Access & cost0

No approved product or verified ongoing access programme. Roche removed acmopatide for T1D from its development pipeline.[5]

These ratings concern add-on treatment alongside insulin in T1D. Maturity reflects the T1D evidence, and safety receives substantial editorial weight because risks differ by drug and population. For example, SGLT2 inhibitors can cause ketoacidosis even without markedly high glucose; this is not exclusive to T1D. Access reflects the stated indication and region, including whether a separate obesity indication applies.

Editor’s take

The phase 2 signal remains relevant to incretin research in type 1 diabetes, but Roche’s primary pipeline document places acmopatide under “Removed from phase II”. Earlier wording on this page misread that table as advancement to phase 3. Short conference-reported follow-up does not settle long-term benefit or safety. No active phase 3 programme or future availability should be inferred.

The full picture

CT-868, also called acmopatide, is a once-daily injected drug that activates two gut-hormone receptors at once — GLP-1 and GIP. Drugs in this family are familiar from type 2 diabetes and obesity, where they lower glucose, slow the stomach's emptying, and cause substantial weight loss. What makes CT-868 different is intent. According to the American Diabetes Association, it is the first dual GLP-1/GIP agonist developed specifically for type 1 diabetes, rather than a type 2 drug that people with T1D and their doctors have tried off-label and hoped would translate.

The evidence is one trial. It was randomized and placebo-controlled, which matters, and it enrolled 111 adults who had type 1 diabetes and a BMI of at least 27 kg/m² — mean age 41, mean BMI 34, mean starting A1c 7.5%. Participants took acmopatide at 1.8, 4.1 or 6.6 mg once daily, or placebo, for 16 weeks. Everyone stayed on insulin; this is an add-on, not a replacement, and nothing about it changes the fact that a person with type 1 diabetes needs insulin to live.

At the 4.1 mg dose, A1c fell by 0.34% from baseline, and 56% of participants got below 7%. Weight loss was dose-dependent and reached about 7% versus placebo. Daily insulin dose dropped by up to 15% versus placebo.

Those three results are not equally impressive, and it is worth being blunt about which is which. A 0.34% A1c reduction from a baseline of 7.5% is a modest glycemic effect — real, but not transformative, and the trial did not release continuous-glucose time-in-range figures, which is the number most people would actually want. The weight and insulin-dose effects are the substantial ones. For adults with type 1 diabetes who also carry excess weight and insulin resistance — trial participants had BMIs of at least 27 kg/m² (mean 34) — that combination is the point of the drug.

Safety is the question that decides whether any adjunct is worth taking in type 1 diabetes, and here the early news is reassuring. Over the 16 weeks there were no cases of diabetic ketoacidosis and no cases of level 3 (severe) hypoglycemia. Time spent below 54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L) did rise numerically in the groups taking the drug, but every group stayed under the recommended ceiling of 1% of the day. The drug was described as generally well tolerated. Set against that: this class slows gastric emptying and reduces food intake, and the trial cut people's insulin doses — a combination that demands care with dose timing, and one that 111 people followed for four months cannot fully characterise.

Two caveats deserve equal weight with the results. First, this is conference data, not a publication. The type 1 findings were presented at the ADA's 86th Scientific Sessions in June 2026 and released by press release; they have not been peer-reviewed. There is a peer-reviewed Phase 2 of CT-868 — but it is in type 2 diabetes, and type 2 evidence does not establish anything about safety or benefit in type 1. Second, Roche removed the programme from its pipeline. Its 23 July 2026 update places RG6641/acmopatide for T1D under “Removed from phase II”.5 This page previously misread the table as a move to phase 3. No phase 3 advancement or launch timeline is established.

One quieter reason this belongs on the artificial-pancreas map as well as the pharmacy shelf: an incretin drug blunts the post-meal glucose spike at its source, by slowing how fast food arrives. A closed loop struggles most with meals it was not told about. A drug that flattens the meal curve makes the loop's hardest guess an easier one — the same logic behind pairing insulin with amylin in fully-closed-loop research. That is a hypothesis, not a finding; nobody has yet tested CT-868 inside an automated insulin delivery system.

Coming soon

ETA · No current approval or launch timeline after Roche removed the programme in July 2026.

  • →Full peer-reviewed type 1 phase 2 results, if published; no further development milestone has been established.

Sources

  1. [1]
    First Dual GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonist Developed for Type 1 Diabetes Shows Promising Benefits in Blood Glucose Control · Conference finding — Presented at the ADA's 86th Scientific Sessions, June 2026. Randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 2: 111 adults with type 1 diabetes and BMI at or above 27 kg/m2 (mean age 41, mean BMI 34, mean baseline A1c 7.5%), four arms (1.8, 4.1 or 6.6 mg once daily, or placebo), 16 weeks to the primary endpoint. At 4.1 mg, A1c fell 0.34% and 56% reached below 7%; dose-dependent weight loss up to about 7%; insulin dose reduced up to 15% versus placebo.
  2. [2]
    First Dual GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonist Developed for Type 1 Diabetes Shows Promising Benefits in Blood Glucose Control (ADA newsroom) · Conference finding — ADA newsroom release accompanying the June 2026 Scientific Sessions presentation.
  3. [3]
    Once-daily GLP-1/GIP dual agonist lowers HbA1c, weight in type 1 diabetes · Science journalism · 2026-06-06 — Conference coverage reporting the safety detail the headline release did not: no cases of level 3 hypoglycemia and no cases of diabetic ketoacidosis during the trial. Time below 54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L) increased numerically in the acmopatide arms but all groups stayed below the recommended 1% threshold.
  4. [4]
    Efficacy and safety of CT-868, a fully biased dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist, in type 2 diabetes: a phase 2 trial · Peer-reviewed study — Published 2026 in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. The peer-reviewed *type 2* Phase 2. Useful for background pharmacology only — it is not evidence for use in type 1 diabetes and this item is not scored on it.
  5. [5]
    Roche half-year 2026 pharmaceuticals pipeline · Manufacturer · 2026-07-23 — Page 2, Q2 2026 pipeline changes: RG6641 acmopatide – T1D appears under “Removed from phase II”. This is discontinuation from the pipeline, not advancement to phase III.

    Roche. Half-year 2026 pharmaceuticals pipeline (status 23 July 2026).